Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 571 indexed citations. Written by Alex D. Reyes, Rafael Luján, Andrei Rozov, Nail Burnashev, Péter Somogyi and Bert Sakmann covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (521 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (433 citations) and Molecular Biology (114 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/1092 →

Countries where authors are citing Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/1092.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026