Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.
- Authors
- Maike LuhmannLouise C. Hawkley
- Journal
- Developmental Psychology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/dev0000117 →Countries where authors are citing Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.
This map shows the geographic impact of Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.
This network shows the impact of Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age..
About Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.
This paper, published in 2016, received 486 indexed citations . Written by Maike Luhmann and Louise C. Hawkley covering the research area of Social Psychology, Health and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health (344 citations), Social Psychology (227 citations) and Clinical Psychology (163 citations). Published in Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/dev0000117.