Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.

436 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 436 indexed citations. Written by Zac E. Imel, Kevin M. Laska, Matthew Jakupcak and Tracy L. Simpson covering the research area of Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (389 citations), Epidemiology (121 citations) and Social Psychology (67 citations). Published in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1037/a0031474 →

Countries where authors are citing Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/a0031474.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026