Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1029/97jd02400 →Countries where authors are citing Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere
This map shows the geographic impact of Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere
This network shows the impact of Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere.
About Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere
This paper, published in 1997, received 465 indexed citations . Written by Christian Rocken, R. A. Anthes, Michael Exner, Doug Hunt, Sergey Sokolovskiy, Robert S. Ware, M. E. Gorbunov, William Schreiner, D. Feng and Benjamin M. Herman covering the research area of Oceanography, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (406 citations), Aerospace Engineering (268 citations) and Oceanography (225 citations). Published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1029/97jd02400.