Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases
- Authors
- Richard N. Armstrong
- Journal
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/tx960072x →Countries where authors are citing Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases
This map shows the geographic impact of Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases
This network shows the impact of Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases.
About Structure, Catalytic Mechanism, and Evolution of the Glutathione Transferases
This paper, published in 1997, received 938 indexed citations . Written by Richard N. Armstrong covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Pollution. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (825 citations), Pharmacology (121 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (70 citations). Published in Chemical Research in Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/tx960072x.