GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 853 indexed citations. Written by Alessio Ceroni, Kai Maaß, Hildegard Geyer, Rudolf Geyer, Anne Dell and Stuart M. Haslam covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (750 citations), Organic Chemistry (278 citations) and Immunology (187 citations). Published in Journal of Proteome Research.

Countries where authors are citing GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/pr7008252.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026