Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data
- Authors
- John P. CortensRonald C. Beavis
- Journal
- Journal of Proteome Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/pr049882h →Countries where authors are citing Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data
This map shows the geographic impact of Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data
This network shows the impact of Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data.
About Open Source System for Analyzing, Validating, and Storing Protein Identification Data
This paper, published in 2004, received 545 indexed citations . Written by John P. Cortens and Ronald C. Beavis covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (456 citations), Spectroscopy (365 citations) and Cell Biology (30 citations). Published in Journal of Proteome Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/pr049882h.