A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds
- Journal
- Organic Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ol006054v →Countries where authors are citing A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds
This map shows the geographic impact of A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds
This network shows the impact of A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds.
About A “Traceless” Staudinger Ligation for the Chemoselective Synthesis of Amide Bonds
This paper, published in 2000, received 526 indexed citations . Written by Eliana Saxon, Joshua I. Armstrong and Carolyn R. Bertozzi covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (444 citations), Organic Chemistry (440 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (114 citations). Published in Organic Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ol006054v.