Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors
- Journal
- ACS Nano
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nn700375n →Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors
This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors
This network shows the impact of Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors.
About Evaluation of Solution-Processed Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Transparent Conductors
This paper, published in 2008, received 2.8k indexed citations . Written by Héctor A. Becerril, Jie Mao, Zunfeng Liu, Randall M. Stoltenberg, Zhenan Bao and Yongsheng Chen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (2.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.4k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations). Published in ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nn700375n.