Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2
- Journal
- ACS Nano
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nn501175k →Countries where authors are citing Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2
This map shows the geographic impact of Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2
This network shows the impact of Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2.
About Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Crystalline Monolayer MoSe2
This paper, published in 2014, received 713 indexed citations . Written by Xingli Wang, Yongji Gong, Gang Shi, Wai Leong Chow, Kunttal Keyshar, Gonglan Ye, Róbert Vajtai, Jun Lou, Zheng Liu and Emilie Ringe covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (653 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (325 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (104 citations). Published in ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nn501175k.