Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots
- Journal
- ACS Nano
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nn500368m →Countries where authors are citing Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots
This map shows the geographic impact of Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots
This network shows the impact of Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots.
About Common Origin of Green Luminescence in Carbon Nanodots and Graphene Quantum Dots
This paper, published in 2014, received 701 indexed citations . Written by Lei Wang, Shoujun Zhu, Hai‐Yu Wang, Songnan Qu, Yong‐Lai Zhang, Junhu Zhang, Qi‐Dai Chen, Huailiang Xu, Wei Han and Yang Bai covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (679 citations), Biomedical Engineering (140 citations) and Molecular Biology (93 citations). Published in ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nn500368m.