Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation
- Journal
- ACS Nano
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nn204476h →Countries where authors are citing Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation
This map shows the geographic impact of Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation
This network shows the impact of Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation.
About Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation
This paper, published in 2012, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Shan Huang, Scott X. Mao, Ting Zhu and Jianyu Huang. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.9k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (752 citations) and Automotive Engineering (723 citations). Published in ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nn204476h.