Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity
- Journal
- ACS Nano
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nn2013904 →Countries where authors are citing Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity
This map shows the geographic impact of Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity
This network shows the impact of Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity.
About Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity
This paper, published in 2011, received 564 indexed citations . Written by Yu Tian, Alexander Malugin and Hamidreza Ghandehari covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (260 citations), Biomaterials (249 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (232 citations). Published in ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nn2013904.