Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes
- Journal
- ACS Nano
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nn100118m →Countries where authors are citing Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes
This map shows the geographic impact of Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes
This network shows the impact of Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.
About Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes
This paper, published in 2010, received 535 indexed citations . Written by Amanda L. Higginbotham, Dmitry V. Kosynkin, Alexander Sinitskii, Zhengzong Sun and James M. Tour covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (361 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (261 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (173 citations). Published in ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nn100118m.