Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl904092h →Countries where authors are citing Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems
This network shows the impact of Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems.
About Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems
This paper, published in 2010, received 3.3k indexed citations . Written by Sung Hyun Jo, Ting‐Chang Chang, Idongesit E. Ebong, Pinaki Mazumder and Wei Lü covering the research area of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.8k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (745 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl904092h.