Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl9034237 →Countries where authors are citing Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning
This network shows the impact of Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning.
About Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning
This paper, published in 2009, received 741 indexed citations . Written by Jia Zhu, Ching-Mei Hsu, Zongfu Yu, Shanhui Fan and Yi Cui covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (485 citations), Biomedical Engineering (437 citations) and Materials Chemistry (299 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl9034237.