Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl9034219 →Countries where authors are citing Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors
This map shows the geographic impact of Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors
This network shows the impact of Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors.
About Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors
This paper, published in 2009, received 474 indexed citations . Written by Xuan Gao, Gengfeng Zheng and Charles M. Lieber covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (369 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (327 citations) and Bioengineering (157 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl9034219.