Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl8024328 →Countries where authors are citing Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes
This map shows the geographic impact of Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes
This network shows the impact of Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes.
About Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes
This paper, published in 2008, received 559 indexed citations . Written by Do Kyung Kim, P. Muralidharan, Hyun‐Wook Lee, Riccardo Ruffο, Yuan Yang, Candace K. Chan, Hailin Peng, Robert A. Huggins and Yi Cui covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (531 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (262 citations), Automotive Engineering (129 citations), Materials Chemistry (88 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (76 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl8024328.