Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl503799t →Countries where authors are citing Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides
This map shows the geographic impact of Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides
This network shows the impact of Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides.
About Exciton Radiative Lifetimes in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides
This paper, published in 2015, received 568 indexed citations . Written by Maurizia Palummo, Marco Bernardi and Jeffrey C. Grossman covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (514 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (355 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (104 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl503799t.