Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl403669a →Countries where authors are citing Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries
This map shows the geographic impact of Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries
This network shows the impact of Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries.
About Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries
This paper, published in 2013, received 449 indexed citations . Written by Richard Y. Wang, Colin Wessells, Robert A. Huggins and Yi Cui covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (423 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (116 citations) and Materials Chemistry (74 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl403669a.