Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl403661s →Countries where authors are citing Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
This map shows the geographic impact of Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
This network shows the impact of Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction.
About Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
This paper, published in 2013, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Damien Voiry, M. Salehi, Rafael Silva, Takeshi Fujita, Mingwei Chen, Tewodros Asefa, Vivek B. Shenoy, Goki Eda and Manish Chhowalla covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (1.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.3k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (957 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl403661s.