Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl401938t →Countries where authors are citing Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence
This map shows the geographic impact of Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence
This network shows the impact of Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence.
About Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 on Mica with Novel Photoluminescence
This paper, published in 2013, received 514 indexed citations . Written by Qingqing Ji, Yanfeng Zhang, Teng Gao, Yù Zhang, Donglin Ma, Mengxi Liu, Yubin Chen, Xiaofen Qiao, Ping‐Heng Tan and Min Kan covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (491 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (215 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (67 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl401938t.