Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl304379k →Countries where authors are citing Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon
This map shows the geographic impact of Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon
This network shows the impact of Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon.
About Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon
This paper, published in 2013, received 387 indexed citations . Written by Jiangwei Wang, Yu He, Feifei Fan, Xiao Hua Liu, Shuman Xia, Yang Liu, Charles Thomas Harris, Hong Li, Jianyu Huang and Scott X. Mao covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (362 citations), Automotive Engineering (130 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (92 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl304379k.