Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl304078v →Countries where authors are citing Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles
This map shows the geographic impact of Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles
This network shows the impact of Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles.
About Observation of Quantum Tunneling between Two Plasmonic Nanoparticles
This paper, published in 2012, received 444 indexed citations . Written by Jonathan A. Scholl, Aitzol García‐Etxarri, Ai Leen Koh and Jennifer A. Dionne covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (338 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (330 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (110 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl304078v.