Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl3016957 →Countries where authors are citing Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications
This network shows the impact of Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications.
About Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications
This paper, published in 2012, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Yuliang Cao, Lifen Xiao, Maria L. Sushko, Wei Wang, Birgit Schwenzer, Jie Xiao, Zimin Nie, Laxmikant V. Saraf and Jun Liu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.7k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (893 citations) and Materials Chemistry (333 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl3016957.