Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl3003039 →Countries where authors are citing Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy
This map shows the geographic impact of Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy
This network shows the impact of Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy.
About Pyroelectric Nanogenerators for Harvesting Thermoelectric Energy
This paper, published in 2012, received 648 indexed citations . Written by Ya Yang, Wenxi Guo, Ken C. Pradel, Guang Zhu, Yusheng Zhou, Yan Zhang, Youfan Hu, Long Lin and Zhong Lin Wang covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (478 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (255 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (245 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl3003039.