Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl2029392 →Countries where authors are citing Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production
This map shows the geographic impact of Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production
This network shows the impact of Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production.
About Branched TiO2 Nanorods for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production
This paper, published in 2011, received 828 indexed citations . Written by In Sun Cho, Zhebo Chen, Arnold J. Forman, Dong Rip Kim, Pratap M. Rao, Thomas F. Jaramillo and Xiaolin Zheng covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (703 citations), Materials Chemistry (629 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (220 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl2029392.