Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl202362d →Countries where authors are citing Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface
This map shows the geographic impact of Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface
This network shows the impact of Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface.
About Infrared Nanoscopy of Dirac Plasmons at the Graphene–SiO2 Interface
This paper, published in 2011, received 467 indexed citations . Written by Zhe Fei, Gregory Andreev, Wenzhong Bao, Alexander McLeod, Chen Wang, M. K. Stewart, Zeng Zhao, G. Domínguez, M. H. Thiemens and M. M. Fogler covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (368 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (219 citations) and Materials Chemistry (186 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl202362d.