Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates
- Authors
- Kwi‐Il ParkSheng XuYing LiuGeon‐Tae HwangSuk‐Joong L. Kang
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl102959k →Countries where authors are citing Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates
This map shows the geographic impact of Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates
This network shows the impact of Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates.
About Piezoelectric BaTiO3Thin Film Nanogenerator on Plastic Substrates
This paper, published in 2010, received 715 indexed citations . Written by Kwi‐Il Park, Sheng Xu, Ying Liu, Geon‐Tae Hwang, Suk‐Joong L. Kang, Zhong Lin Wang and Keon Jae Lee covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Polymers and Plastics and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (559 citations), Materials Chemistry (255 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (236 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl102959k.