Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl102725k →Countries where authors are citing Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode
This map shows the geographic impact of Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode
This network shows the impact of Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode.
About Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode
This paper, published in 2010, received 616 indexed citations . Written by Hui Wu, Liangbing Hu, Michael W. Rowell, Desheng Kong, J. Judy, James R. McDonough, Jia Zhu, Yuan Yang, Michael D. McGehee and Yi Cui covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (419 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (413 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (187 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl102725k.