1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl100812k →Countries where authors are citing 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers
This map shows the geographic impact of 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers
This network shows the impact of 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers.
About 1.6 V Nanogenerator for Mechanical Energy Harvesting Using PZT Nanofibers
This paper, published in 2010, received 744 indexed citations . Written by Xi Chen, Shiyou Xu, Nan Yao and Yong Shi covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (668 citations), Polymers and Plastics (316 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (312 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl100812k.