Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl070477+ →Countries where authors are citing Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors
This map shows the geographic impact of Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors
This network shows the impact of Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors.
About Graphene−Silica Composite Thin Films as Transparent Conductors
This paper, published in 2007, received 750 indexed citations . Written by Supinda Watcharotone, Dmitriy A. Dikin, Sasha Stankovich, Richard D. Piner, Inhwa Jung, Geoffrey Dommett, Guennadi Evmenenko, Shang-En Wu, Shufang Chen and Chuan‐Pu Liu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Polymers and Plastics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (620 citations), Biomedical Engineering (342 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (293 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl070477+.