Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays

801 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 801 indexed citations. Written by Karin Pulskamp and Harald F. Krug covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (637 citations), Biomedical Engineering (474 citations) and Biomaterials (138 citations). Published in Nano Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Oops They Did It Again! Carbon Nanotubes Hoax Scientists in Viability Assays.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl060177c.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026