Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing
- Biomedical Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl052134m →Countries where authors are citing Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing
This map shows the geographic impact of Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing
This network shows the impact of Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing.
About Zeptogram-Scale Nanomechanical Mass Sensing
This paper, published in 2006, received 804 indexed citations . Written by Ya‐Tang Yang, Carlo Callegari, Philip X.‐L. Feng, K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (699 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (565 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (281 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl052134m.