Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl0515753 →Countries where authors are citing Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes
This map shows the geographic impact of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes
This network shows the impact of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes.
About Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Nanocubes
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Leif J. Sherry, Shih‐Hui Chang, George C. Schatz, Richard P. Van Duyne, Benjamin J. Wiley and Younan Xia covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (922 citations), Biomedical Engineering (886 citations) and Materials Chemistry (306 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl0515753.