Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl050127s →Countries where authors are citing Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy
This map shows the geographic impact of Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy
This network shows the impact of Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy.
About Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Christopher Loo, Amanda Lowery, Naomi J. Halas, Jennifer L. West and Rebekah A. Drezek covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (912 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (772 citations) and Materials Chemistry (489 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl050127s.