Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl049461z →Countries where authors are citing Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor
This map shows the geographic impact of Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor
This network shows the impact of Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor.
About Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor
This paper, published in 2004, received 535 indexed citations . Written by Hou T. Ng, Jin‐Woo Han, Toshishige Yamada, Peggy Nguyen and M. Meyyappan covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (380 citations), Materials Chemistry (363 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (282 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl049461z.