Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles
- Materials Chemistry
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl047996m →Countries where authors are citing Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles
This map shows the geographic impact of Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles
This network shows the impact of Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles.
About Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS Nanoparticles
This paper, published in 2004, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Christian Kirchner, Tim Liedl, Stefan Kudera, Teresa Pellegrino, Almudena Muñoz Javier, Hermann E. Gaub, Niels Fertig and Wolfgang J. Parak covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Molecular Biology (464 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (335 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl047996m.