Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl034223+ →Countries where authors are citing Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering
This map shows the geographic impact of Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering
This network shows the impact of Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering.
About Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering
This paper, published in 2003, received 576 indexed citations . Written by G. Raschke, Stefan Kowarik, T. Franzl, Carsten Sönnichsen, Thomas A. Klar, Jochen Feldmann, Alfons Nichtl and K. Kürzinger covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (398 citations), Biomedical Engineering (383 citations) and Molecular Biology (256 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl034223+.