Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule

859 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 859 indexed citations. Written by Kornelius Nielsch, Jinsub Choi, Kathrin Schwirn, Ralf B. Wehrspohn and U. Gösele covering the research area of Pollution, Materials Chemistry and Civil and Structural Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (798 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (258 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (248 citations). Published in Nano Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina:  The 10 Porosity Rule.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl025537k.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026