Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl010065f →Countries where authors are citing Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions
This map shows the geographic impact of Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions
This network shows the impact of Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions.
About Stabilization of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions
This paper, published in 2001, received 604 indexed citations . Written by Rajdip Bandyopadhyaya, Einat Nativ‐Roth, Oren Regev and Rachel Yerushalmi‐Rozen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (443 citations), Biomedical Engineering (273 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (159 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl010065f.