Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma9514333 →Countries where authors are citing Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates
This map shows the geographic impact of Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates
This network shows the impact of Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates.
About Lattice Model of Polymer Melt Intercalation in Organically-Modified Layered Silicates
This paper, published in 1997, received 616 indexed citations . Written by Richard A. Vaia and Emmanuel P. Giannelis covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Polymers and Plastics (569 citations), Biomaterials (211 citations) and Materials Chemistry (172 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma9514333.