Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma9025948 →Countries where authors are citing Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis
This network shows the impact of Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis.
About Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis
This paper, published in 2010, received 792 indexed citations . Written by Matthew K. Kiesewetter, Eun Ji Shin, James L. Hedrick and Robert M. Waymouth covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Process Chemistry and Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (597 citations), Organic Chemistry (565 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (499 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma9025948.