Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 880 indexed citations. Written by Alessandro Gandini covering the research area of Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (515 citations), Polymers and Plastics (404 citations) and Organic Chemistry (304 citations). Published in Macromolecules.

Countries where authors are citing Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma801735u.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026