Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma60048a024 →Countries where authors are citing Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation
This map shows the geographic impact of Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation
This network shows the impact of Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation.
About Solutions of Flexible Polymers. Neutron Experiments and Interpretation
This paper, published in 1975, received 732 indexed citations . Written by M. Daoud, J. P. Cotton, B. Farnoux, G. Jannink, G. Sarma, H. Benoît, Cyndie Picot and P. G. de Gennes covering the research area of Radiation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (308 citations), Organic Chemistry (197 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (193 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma60048a024.