Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma0511189 →Countries where authors are citing Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition
This map shows the geographic impact of Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition
This network shows the impact of Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition.
About Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition
This paper, published in 2005, received 645 indexed citations . Written by Minglin Ma, Yu Mao, Malancha Gupta, Karen K. Gleason and Gregory C. Rutledge covering the research area of Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surfaces, Coatings and Films (493 citations), Biomedical Engineering (344 citations) and Biomaterials (237 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma0511189.