Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma020444a →Countries where authors are citing Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers
This map shows the geographic impact of Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers
This network shows the impact of Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers.
About Micro- and Nanostructured Surface Morphology on Electrospun Polymer Fibers
This paper, published in 2002, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Silke Megelski, Jean S. Stephens, D. Bruce Chase and John F. Rabolt covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (874 citations), Biomedical Engineering (659 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (322 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma020444a.