A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface
- Authors
- Young Hwa KimRichard P. Wool
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma00241a013 →Countries where authors are citing A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface
This map shows the geographic impact of A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface
This network shows the impact of A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface.
About A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface
This paper, published in 1983, received 449 indexed citations . Written by Young Hwa Kim and Richard P. Wool covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Polymers and Plastics (311 citations), Mechanical Engineering (104 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (88 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma00241a013.