Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate)
- Journal
- Macromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ma00008a008 →Countries where authors are citing Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate)
This map shows the geographic impact of Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate)
This network shows the impact of Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate).
About Synthesis, properties, and biodegradation of poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate)
This paper, published in 1991, received 437 indexed citations . Written by Kan Zhu, R. Wayne Hendren, Kasper Løvborg Jensen and Colin G. Pitt covering the research area of Pollution, Process Chemistry and Technology and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (368 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (197 citations) and Organic Chemistry (192 citations). Published in Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ma00008a008.