Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots
- Journal
- Langmuir
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/la9713863 →Countries where authors are citing Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots
This map shows the geographic impact of Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots
This network shows the impact of Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots.
About Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2 Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots
This paper, published in 1998, received 522 indexed citations . Written by Arie Zaban, O. I. Mićić, Brian A. Gregg and Arthur J. Nozik covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (486 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (365 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (238 citations). Published in Langmuir.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/la9713863.